‘An error of judgement’: Pro Ref admits mistake in awarding Haaland’s derby winner

Pro Ref has acknowledged a mistake in the VAR decision that awarded Erling Haaland a goal in the Manchester derby, after Enzo Fernández was incorrectly ruled not to be interfering with play. The elite officiating body will review the incident and has reached out to Manchester United. The error high…

In a rare admission of error, the Premier League’s elite officiating body, Pro Ref, has confirmed that the video assistant referee (VAR) misjudged a crucial moment in the 199th Manchester derby. The decision, which awarded Erling Haaland a goal for Manchester City, should not have stood because Enzo Fernández was, in fact, interfering with play during the build‑up.

What Happened on the Pitch

During the 60th minute of the match at Old Trafford, a cross from Josko Gvardiol found Patrick Dorgu’s boot and then passed to Enzo Fernández. Fernández, who was positioned close to the ball, was later ruled by VAR to have not interfered. The ball then went past Lisandro Martínez and into the path of Haaland, who finished the move to score. The on‑field referee had initially called Haaland offside, but VAR overturned the call, citing that Fernández was not in the way.

Pro Ref’s statement clarified that the on‑field decision was indeed offside, but the VAR’s assessment that Fernández was not interfering was incorrect. The body said that the interference rule is subjective and that, in this case, the VAR should have recommended an on‑field review rather than a clear decision.

Reactions from Key Figures

Manchester United manager Michael Carrick expressed frustration with the decision. "I didn’t see it clearly at the time, but the explanation was that he wasn’t interfering, so I can’t understand how that’s the case," he said. Carrick also criticized the layers of technology and bureaucracy that he feels complicate refereeing decisions.

Manchester City’s manager, Pep Guardiola, defended the goal, stating that the fourth official had already confirmed Haaland was onside. He also commented on the controversial red card issued to Phil Foden earlier in the match, suggesting that Bruno Fernandes also deserved a card for his actions.

Implications for the Season

With the goal counted, Manchester City now sit second in the Premier League, just one point behind Arsenal on goal difference. Manchester United, meanwhile, have only four points and sit in 13th place. The outcome of the derby has intensified the pressure on United’s management and squad to improve their performance in the remaining fixtures.

Pro Ref’s admission comes at a time when the debate over VAR’s role in modern football is at a fever pitch. The body’s decision to review the incident and contact Manchester United signals a willingness to address mistakes, but it also raises questions about consistency and transparency in officiating.

What Happens Next

Pro Ref will conduct a formal review of the incident. While the current decision stands, the body has indicated that the goal may be rescinded if the review finds that the interference rule was misapplied. Manchester United has been notified and will have the opportunity to provide input before any final decision is made.

Both clubs will also be scrutinized for how they respond to the potential reversal. For Manchester City, a loss of the goal could affect their title hopes, while for United, it could provide a small boost in morale and points.

The incident underscores the importance of clear guidelines and consistent application of the offside and interference rules. As the Premier League continues to rely on VAR, the expectation is that such errors will become increasingly rare, but this case serves as a reminder that human oversight still plays a role.

In the meantime, fans and pundits will be watching closely to see whether Pro Ref’s review leads to a change in the match’s official record and what impact that may have on the standings.

Key Takeaways

  • Pro Ref admits VAR misjudged Enzo Fernández’s interference in Haaland’s goal.
  • Manchester United’s manager criticized the decision and the complexity of VAR.
  • Manchester City’s manager defended the goal and highlighted a controversial red card.
  • The incident could affect the Premier League standings and the clubs’ season trajectories.
  • Pro Ref will review the decision and has contacted Manchester United.

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the interference rule? It states that a player is considered interfering if they are in the way of an opponent or if they touch the ball while it is in play.
  • Will the goal be overturned? It depends on the outcome of Pro Ref’s review; if they confirm the interference, the goal could be rescinded.
  • How does this affect the Premier League standings? If the goal is overturned, Manchester City would drop a point, potentially altering their position relative to Arsenal.
  • What does this mean for VAR’s future? It highlights the need for clearer guidelines and consistent application of rules.

Why it matters

The incident highlights the growing scrutiny of VAR decisions and the importance of accurate officiating in high‑stakes matches, affecting team standings and fan trust.

Key points

  • Pro Ref admits VAR error in Haaland’s goal
  • Manchester United’s manager criticizes decision
  • Pep Guardiola defends the goal and comments on red card
  • Potential impact on Premier League standings
  • Pro Ref will review and has contacted Manchester United

Frequently asked questions

What is the interference rule?

It states that a player is considered interfering if they are in the way of an opponent or if they touch the ball while it is in play.

Will the goal be overturned?

It depends on the outcome of Pro Ref’s review; if they confirm the interference, the goal could be rescinded.

How does this affect the Premier League standings?

If the goal is overturned, Manchester City would drop a point, potentially altering their position relative to Arsenal.

What does this mean for VAR’s future?

It highlights the need for clearer guidelines and consistent application of rules.

Reporting drawn from

More from World

Felo News, House 42, Bridge Colony, Kot Lakhpat, Lahore, Pakistan
+92 308 4354717 · felopronews@gmail.com