Brief
Penrith Panthers’ win highlights NRL sanction inconsistencies
A 25‑point victory for Penrith over Newcastle in the NRL preliminary final has reignited criticism of the league’s inconsistent sanctioning of similar on‑field offences.
By Felo News Desk · Published
The Penrith Panthers defeated the Newcastle Knights 25‑0 in the 2026 NRL preliminary final, a result that has intensified debate over the league’s inconsistent sanctioning of hip‑drop tackles. The match, played on 28 September 2026, was the first time the Panthers have reached this stage since 2016.
Earlier in the season, Phoenix Crossland’s hip‑drop tackle on Nathan Cleary broke Cleary’s ankle and led to Crossland’s dismissal from the game and a pending suspension that would rule him out of the grand final. The incident was referred straight to the NRL judiciary, but no grading was attached, leaving the severity of the offence open to interpretation.
In contrast, Victor Radley’s hip‑drop on Herbie Farnworth earlier in the season resulted only in a penalty, with no further disciplinary action. The differing outcomes have prompted criticism that the NRL applies its sanctions inconsistently, potentially favouring certain clubs.
Officials from the league have defended the approach, citing the need to consider the injury suffered by the victim when determining the sanction. However, critics argue that the lack of a clear, consistent framework undermines player safety and fairness.
Key facts
- Penrith Panthers beat Newcastle Knights 25‑0 in the preliminary final (smh.com.au)
- Phoenix Crossland’s hip‑drop on Nathan Cleary broke Cleary’s ankle and led to Crossland’s dismissal (smh.com.au)
- Victor Radley’s hip‑drop on Herbie Farnworth resulted only in a penalty (smh.com.au)
- The NRL has no consistent grading system for hip‑drop tackles (smh.com.au)
Background
The NRL’s handling of hip‑drop tackles has been a recurring point of contention, with earlier incidents involving Cleary and Farnworth highlighting perceived inconsistencies in sanctioning. The league’s approach to grading injuries has been questioned by clubs and commentators alike.
Why it matters
The outcome may influence future NRL disciplinary procedures and player safety protocols.
What happens next
The NRL judiciary will review Crossland’s case, and the league may consider revising its grading system for similar offences.
Sources
- [1] smh.com.au — originally reported as “Two hip drops, two very different results: NRL’s inconsistency leaves it open to criticism”
