Chris Hansen Criticises Robert Pattinson’s ‘Primetime’
Chris Hansen, the real‑life host of the 2004‑2007 NBC series To Catch a Predator, watched the biopic ‘Primetime’ and found it largely fictional. He criticized the portrayal of his life, calling it mean‑spirited and detached, and gave Pattinson a D grade for his performance.
By Felo News Desk · Published
On a Thursday night in New York, former NBC host Chris Hansen left a Times Square AMC after watching the biographical thriller Primetime. The film, directed by Lance Oppenheim and starring Robert Pattinson as Hansen, premiered in the U.S. on September 25 and in the U.K. on October 30. Hansen, who hosted the controversial reality series To Catch a Predator from 2004 to 2007, was quick to share his thoughts on his own podcast, Have A Seat With Chris Hansen.
What Happened in the Film
Primetime follows the creation of the NBC reality series that aimed to catch alleged child sexual predators by luring them into a staged house where they would be confronted by Hansen and a camera crew. The show, which ran for three years, combined law enforcement with a form of digital vigilantism, and it sparked debate over the ethics of its methods. In the movie, Robert Pattinson portrays Hansen, while Skyler Gisondo plays Dan Plumb, a decoy actor hired to lure predators. The film mixes real footage and reenactments, but it takes creative liberties that have drawn criticism from Hansen himself.
Hansen’s Initial Reaction
Before the public release, Hansen declined an early private screening because he did not want to sign the required non‑disclosure agreement. He had previously hinted at his displeasure, describing the film as “completely made up” and “98 percent pure fiction.” When he finally watched the movie, he said the most disturbing element was the portrayal of him as an aloof, detached father—a depiction he called mean‑spirited and untrue. Hansen also criticized a scene in which Pattinson, shirtless, recites lines in front of a mirror, calling it absurd.
Criticism of the Film’s Accuracy
Hansen’s comments highlight a broader issue: the film’s attempt to dramatize the early days of To Catch a Predator. He noted that the show was always a primetime program, contradicting the movie’s suggestion that it struggled to gain a foothold. Hansen also took issue with the director’s vision, describing Oppenheim’s approach as a “horror‑like film with interesting photography” that ignored the reality of the show’s impact. He said the movie’s portrayal of the series as a small‑time operation was misleading, and that the film’s artistic liberties made it “so detached from reality.”
Ratings for Pattinson’s Performance
Despite his criticism of the film’s narrative, Hansen offered a nuanced view of Pattinson’s acting. He gave the actor a D grade, acknowledging that Pattinson is a talented performer but feeling that his portrayal did not capture the essence of Hansen’s public persona. Hansen’s assessment came after Pattinson’s own remarks, where the actor admitted that the film’s reception was “absolutely insane” and that the public’s reaction to a 20‑year‑old TV show was surprising.
Legal and Ethical Concerns
Earlier this month, Hansen discussed potential legal implications with lawyers. He questioned whether the film’s portrayal could be considered defamation, identity theft, or another form of creative liability. Hansen emphasized that as a public figure, the bar for defamation is high and that any claims would need to be supported by clear evidence. He also expressed concern that the movie could be seen as a hit piece, insulting the thousands of people who work to protect children.
What Happens Next?
The film’s release has sparked a broader conversation about the responsibilities of biopics and the fine line between dramatization and misrepresentation. While the movie has already been distributed by A24 and is available on various streaming platforms, Hansen remains unapologetic in his stance. He has stated that he will continue his work on the TruBlu platform and that viewers can form their own opinions about the film. The debate is likely to continue as more viewers watch the movie and weigh the balance between entertainment and factual accuracy.
Why This Matters
Primetime’s portrayal of a real‑life public figure raises important questions about the ethics of biographical storytelling. Hansen’s critique underscores the need for filmmakers to handle sensitive subjects with care, especially when the subject is still active in the public eye.
Key facts
- Chris Hansen found Primetime largely fictional
- He criticized the film’s portrayal of him as detached
- Hansen gave Pattinson a D grade
- The film misrepresented the primetime status of the show
- Legal concerns about defamation and identity theft were raised
- Hansen will continue his work and urges viewers to judge the film
Why it matters
The film’s depiction of a real‑life public figure highlights the tension between creative storytelling and factual integrity, prompting discussions about defamation and the responsibilities of biopics.
Frequently asked questions
What is the main criticism Chris Hansen has about the film?
He says the movie is largely fictional and portrays him as detached and mean‑spirited.
Did Hansen sign a non‑disclosure agreement for the preview?
No, he declined an early screening to avoid signing an NDA.
How did Hansen rate Robert Pattinson’s performance?
He gave him a D grade, acknowledging talent but feeling the portrayal was inaccurate.
What legal issues did Hansen mention?
He discussed potential defamation, identity theft, and the high bar for public figures.
Is the film still being released?
Yes, it is available in cinemas and on streaming platforms.
